Read the paragraph from an interpretive literary analysis. in william shakespeare's hamlet, the main character's indecision and inattention result not only in deaths around him, but also in his own death. hamlet wounds laertes and then they switch swords. before laertes dies, he gets in a last jab at hamlet, who ends up being wounded by his own poisoned sword. the allusion is that not only does laertes die as expected, but hamlet is doomed to die by the poison on his own sword as well. how should this paragraph be revised to use the correct domain-specific vocabulary? the term allusion should be changed to the term characterization. the term allusion should be changed to the term imagery. the term allusion should be changed to the term irony. the term allusion should be changed to the phrase word choice.

In this paragraph from an interpretive literary analysis of William Shakespeare's Hamlet, the term allusion should be changed to the term irony.

This is a very common literary device where a state of affairs or events end up being the contrary to what the readers expect and often amazes the audience.

In this particular part of the play, Hamlet, who is supposed to kill Laertes with his sword, ends up being hurted and poisoned by his own sword. His lack of attention ends with his life at the same moment he ends Laerte's.

This is a very unexpected outcome because Hamlet was about to fulfill his will, but because of his inattention, the situation ends with his life as well.

C. It should be changed to irony

Explanation: i got it right on edg

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.