English, 25.06.2019 13:00, rachel693

Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. what is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper? they will change their research to a different topic and start all over again. they will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting. they will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper. they will sue the journal for not printing the paper and delaying their research.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: English

English, 21.06.2019 23:20, InfinityVicky

Me ! it's e2020! review the line from karin slaughter's npr interview."and with each page, that's what i try to do- is say something different about the character, something different in the reactions when they find these horrible things that are happening, or they figure out a piece of the puzzle."how does this view contract with lee child's central idea in "a simple way to create suspense"? a • child feels that the characters are not important to the plot. slaughter feels characters are central. b • child feels that characters must be unattractive and uninteresting. slaughter feels they must have reactions. c • slaughter builds suspense through her characters. child builds suspense by delaying answers. d • slaughter builds suspense by writing puzzles. child builds suspense by telling anecdotes.

Answers: 1

continue

English, 22.06.2019 02:30, demetriusmoorep36146

What similarities are there between melchizedek and the englishman santiago? explain

Answers: 2

continue

English, 22.06.2019 02:40, itzhari101

Julius caesar. [brutus.] with this, she fell distraught, and, her attendants absent, swallowed fire. cassius. and died so? brutus. even so. cassius. o ye immortal gods! [enter lucius, with wine and taper] brutus. speak no more of her. give me a bowl of wine. in this i bury all unkindness, cassius. cassius. my heart is thirsty for that noble pledge. fill, lucius, till the wine o'erswell the cup; i cannot drink too much of brutus' love. [exit lucius. enter titinius, with messala] brutus. come in, titinius; welcome, good messala. now sit we close about this taper here, and call in question our necessities. cassius. portia, art thou gone? brutus. no more, i pray you. what moral dilemma does brutus confront in this excerpt? brutus lets go of his anger toward cassius and forgives him. brutus decides that he will not mourn portia and will stay loyal to cassius. brutus decides that he is too angry at cassius to remain friends with him. brutus questions whether cassius's life should be ended.

Answers: 3

continue

English, 22.06.2019 07:20, jluvit6135

3. what is the view of caucasians according to j. h.g.?

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientif...