Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? check all of the correct boxes. the premises are not true all of the time. the premises are likely to be true. the premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion. the conclusion follows logically from the premises. the conclusion comes from a different premise.

B). The premises are likely to be true.

C).  The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion.

D). The conclusion follows logically from the premises.

Explanation:

A valid argument is described as the argument in which the premises reasonably functions to ensure the truth and efficacy of the conclusion.

The valid arguments put forth by Plaintiffs would include options B, C, and D. 'The premises are likely to be true' because it contains chances of being false as well(in inductive reasoning). 'The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion' as the premises are directly in proportion with the conclusion and if the premises support the conclusion, then it is considered true or vice versa. 'The conclusion follows logically from the premises' as the conclusion follows the premises. Thus, options B, C, and D are the correct answers.

try to do soaps tone.

s-subject

o-occasion (the reason the author wrote the poem)

a-audience (who is this poem mostly for)

p-purpose (was it to convince, inspire, etc. the audience)

s-speaker (can be the author or another character, like is a child, adult, woman, elderly, animal narrating the poem)

tone- the mood the reader gets from this poem

mood- the mood the author had with their own poem

meaning- what do you think the meaning is?

message- what is the author trying to explain to the audience? like what is the theme?

if you still don't get it try showing everyone the poem so they could unravel it

●intensive purposes is the correct answer