Claim: how could anyone continue eating meat after learning about how the animals are treated? what makes this a weak claim for an arguementative research paper?

Meat contains vital Protein for the body

Explanation:

True. Animals are subject to cruelty, and the butchring process is not exactly the most efficient, and is hard to stomach when done. But getting the proteins, fat, and other vitamins from them is very important for your body. It's almost like getting sunlight, without, your body gets weaker, and you could contract illness. But the same could be said about eating meat. If the meat is spoiled, cooking it would steal mean it isn't safe to eat and you should dispose of it properly via trashcan.

It is not written as a statement

Explanation: It is asking a question rather than stating a fact making it a weak claim

the answer is the speaker views both as possessions that reflect his importance.