Read the passage from a room of ones own. here am i asking why women did not write poetry in the elizabeth age and i am not sure how they are educated. whether they were taught to write weather they had sitting rooms to themselves how many women had children before they were 21 what in short they did from eight in the morning till eight at night they had no money evidently according to professor trevelyan they were married whether they liked it or not before they were out of the nursery at 15 or 16 very likely. it would have been extremely odd even upon this shelby had one of them said only written the plays of shakespeare i concluded and i thought that the older gentleman who is dead now but was a bishop i think who declared that it was impossible for any woman passed present or two come to have the genius of shakespeare which statement best explains how the structure of the text support its main idea ? 1) the problem solution structure empathizes the challenges that female artist face and propose a solution two women who choose to defy cultural norms 2) the chronological structure empathizes the challenges that female artist face by giving detail about the lives of several different women living during this time period 3) the cause affect structure describes societal demand and limitations that were placed on women during this time. showing the underlying cause of a lack of female poet 4) the compare contrast structure shows the difference between a woman who obey cultural norms and a woman who defies them emphasizing that female artist our where

Amaze i know not these my hands and yet i think there was a woman like me once had hands like these. -adelaide what type of poem is "amaze"?

Used for an event that has been completed before the present moment in time. simple past past perfect perfect progressive past perfect progressive

Read the passage, then answer the question that follows. no one could have seen it at the time, but the invention of beet sugar was not just a challenge to cane. it was a hint—just a glimpse, like a twist that comes about two thirds of the way through a movie—that the end of the age of sugar was in sight. for beet sugar showed that in order to create that perfect sweetness you did not need slaves, you did not need plantations, in fact you did not even need cane. beet sugar was a foreshadowing of what we have today: the age of science, in which sweetness is a product of chemistry, not whips. in 1854 only 11 percent of world sugar production came from beets. by 1899 the percentage had risen to about 65 percent. and beet sugar was just the first challenge to cane. by 1879 chemists discovered saccharine—a laboratory-created substance that is several hundred times sweeter than natural sugar. today the sweeteners used in the foods you eat may come from corn (high-fructose corn syrup), from fruit (fructose), or directly from the lab (for example, aspartame, invented in 1965, or sucralose—splenda—created in 1976). brazil is the land that imported more africans than any other to work on sugar plantations, and in brazil the soil is still perfect for sugar. cane grows in brazil today, but not always for sugar. instead, cane is often used to create ethanol, much as corn farmers in america now convert their harvest into fuel. –sugar changed the world, marc aronson and marina budhos how does this passage support the claim that sugar was tied to the struggle for freedom? it shows that the invention of beet sugar created competition for cane sugar. it shows that technology had a role in changing how we sweeten our foods. it shows that the beet sugar trade provided jobs for formerly enslaved workers. it shows that sweeteners did not need to be the product of sugar plantations and slavery.