Read the excerpt from kant's "what is enlightenment? " and answer the question. but should a society of ministers, say a church council, . . have the right to commit itself by oath to a certain unalterable doctrine, in order to secure perpetual guardianship over all its members and through them over the people? how does kant answer the question he rhetorically poses in this excerpt? using details from the text trace the argument of his answer in a response of at least 150 words.

Yes, it is necessary to have a commitment for all the responsible parts of a society of ministers (in this case a Church Council), each one of them has responsibilities and rights so it’s very important to define which are the objectives to complete for each part and which is the decision level that they have inside of the organization, power is the most harmful tool in any organization so it’s very important to define the mean reason, why they are organizing a society, why they have people that wants to see them organized and what do they want to make, this will help to secure perpetual guardianship between each other’s and also will help to show to the follower people that they have convictions, strong and will help to develop a good connection.

For example, a Church Council has the role to administer the church according with the doctrine that they have and a doctrine has a connection between the spiritual and the actions that followers have to develop according with what is written by the ancestress, for example, The Bible, it’s not a contract but says what do you have to do and believe, if not, you can profess your religion according with your own doctrines and you can deviate the focus point of the church.

omg omg omg that looks so so

explanation:

so cut i love it x3

i can you there : )