Which statement from the riddle of the rosetta stone contains an opinion that could be considered biased if facts and examples had not been given to support it? eventually he gave up, saying, “the problem is too complicated, scientifically insoluble.” but akerblad’s success in identifying so many demotic characters now led him to make a serious mistake. it was like the inspired hunches that have led so many of the great advances in science and technology over the ages. because of this mistaken belief, young put roadblocks in his own path.

It was like the inspired hunches that have led so many of the great advances in science and technology over the ages.

This statement could be considered biased if other facts and examples were not provided, because it presents the event as equivalent to other great advances in science and technology over the course of human history. If we do not know more about the "hunch," we would be tempted to think that the author is giving a lot of credit to the scientist, maybe excessively, and that he does not provide enough evidence to make such a grand assumption about the "inspired hunch."

gold miners!

explanation:

im not