In her essay, cooper uses both the first-person and the third-person to express her views. in a short expository essay of at least 200 words, describe how combining her personal experiences with a more academic analysis strengthen the essay.

The use of the first, second or third person when writing any literary, whether it be fictional or non-fictional, work, depends on the purpose of the writer and the objective that the work has. However, there are differences between academic and non-academic writing that will allow a writer the freedom of using or not using the first, second or third person to express views.

First, the use of the first person has the purpose of allowing the writer to show his/her audience his/her personal views on a matter. This type of voice allows the reader to have a closer experience and a front-row seat to the thoughts of the writer. However, the problem, especially when writing academic materials, is that the first person is highly subjective and academic writing, especially essays, depend, to be taken seriously, on the way the writer exposes his/her ideas not as her personal views, but as the general views.

On the other hand, the third person is a type of voice that gives objectivity to writing, making the writer seem like he/she is expressing strictly verifiable facts and data and not merely what comes from his/her thoughts. The problem with only using this voice is that, as said, it is strictly academic and does not give much room for the reader to have a closer experience with the writer and the work.

This is why the use of both voices, first and third, enhances the essay  of Cooper; because it allows the reader to have both experiences at the same time. First, have a closer feel to the thoughts and feelings of the author, and second, know that there is also objectivity in the work. Cooper does not merely express her beliefs and ideas without any proof, but she shows that she uses and speaks of verifiable fact, but in a more informal and easy-to-read type of wiriting.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)