Read the claim from anna north's editorial "why bob dylan shouldn’t have gotten a nobel." bob dylan does not deserve the nobel prize in literature. which sentence from the article offers a logical reason that supports the claim? "he is a wonderful musician, a world-class songwriter and an enormously influential figure in american culture." "when the nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer." "by honoring a musical icon, the committee members may have wanted to bring new cultural currency to the prize and make it feel relevant to a younger generation." "bob dylan does not need a nobel prize in literature, but literature needs a nobel prize." answer is b

The correct answer would be option B: "When the Nobel committee gives the literature prize to a musician, it misses the opportunity to honor a writer". This is a logical reason, since it is true, that only one nobel prize can go to a person each year, and by giving it to Bob Dylan, a writer was left out. Option A is incorrect because it is not a logical reason, it is a compliment. Option C is incorrect because it is an inference as to why they gave the award to Bob Dylan. Option D is incorrect because it is just a statement.

Thank you very much

the african society basically suffered the consequences of colonization and apartheid directly attacking the black people, first, during the colonialism and its main idea which which "white people" had better rights, affecting   them principally in the right to establish black people in their territories, access to quality education and health services and took away any civil right even to the black people to feel they have the same opportunities as the settlers.

this is an ad? the hell is your audience bro xd

explanation: