Which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan deluca's argument in "dylan's nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry"? deluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylan's creative output. overall, deluca's wide-ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry. i find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers. deluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committee's decision. answer is the 2nd option (b)

the answer is: overall, deluca's wide-ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.

in the writing "dylan's nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry" by dan deluca, he is telling about the awards that dylan received, he got the nobel prize in literature, recognizing his rock song letter as poems, in this case deluca use this to support his argument that rock lyrics are poetry.

people wont do this for 10 points you need at least 50

answer: they were written as a long tale

explanation:

i googled it.