English
English, 11.07.2019 05:30, myraa0132

Read the excerpt from the chaste adventures of joseph: a comedy. madam potiphar. she will be back in a moment. i brought her here to show her [joseph], at work. but he is away somewhere, as usual. potiphar. (defensively) he has other duties. madam potiphar. oh, yes, no doubt! potiphar. what's the matter now? madam potiphar. nothing new. you know what i think about this joseph of yours. potiphar. (irritated) now, if you are going to bring that subject up again—! well, i tell you flatly, i won't do it. which best described the tone of this excerpt? combative confused hateful deceitful

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 22.06.2019 03:10, browndariel
What role must the audience play in the creation of an argument? how do bubbles(communities) complicate audience? should audiences be smarter? if yes, how do you make people smarter?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 15:20, tatemelliott
Select the correct answers. read the prologue for act ll of william shakespeare's play romeo and juliet chorus: now old desire doth in his death-bed lie, and young affection gapes to be his heir, that fail for which love groan'd for and would die, with tender juliet match'd, is now not fair. now romeo is beloved and loves again, alike betwitched by the charm of looks, but to his foe supposed he must complain, and she steal love's sweet bait from fearful hooks: being held a foe, he may not have access to breathe such vows as lovers use to swear and she as much in love, her means much less to meet her new-beloved any where: but passion lends them power, time means, to meet tempering extremities with extreme sweet. in the previous act, romeo and juliet have fallen in love, even though their families despise one another. based on the excerpt, purposes of this prologue?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 16:30, yyyyyyyyy9462
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 18:00, rave35
Making predictions is an example of a. making an inference c. misunderstanding a reading b. an unnecessary waste of time d. how to identify the main idea in a passage
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Read the excerpt from the chaste adventures of joseph: a comedy. madam potiphar. she will be back i...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 26.10.2020 03:20
Konu
Advanced Placement (AP), 26.10.2020 03:20