Imagine that you are a peer revise an essay that includes this sentence: "the cowboy jumped from the horse laughing in the face of danger.” which statements accurately explain why this sentence needs to be revised? check all that apply. the sentence makes it seem like the horse is laughing in the face of danger. the sentence makes it seem like the horse jumped off of the cowboy. the sentence makes it seem like the cowboy is laughing in the face of danger. the participial phrase “laughing in the face of danger” is modifying the wrong noun. the participial phrase “laughing in the face of danger” should be closer to “cowboy.”

The first and the last two answer options are the correct answers.

These answers state that:

The sentence presents an incorrect narrative about the horse and the man, as it was written in such a way as to instruct the reader that the horse was laughing, when in fact it was the man. Therefore, to fix this error the clause “laughing in the face of danger” should be placed next to the noun "cowboy."

More information about textual coherence at the link:

link

These are the reasons why the sentence should be revised. The way the phrase "laughing in the face of danger" is placed in the sentence leads to several confusing assumptions. The sentence makes it seem like the horse is the one who is laughing in the face of danger. This is because the sentence is placed in a way that it modifies the wrong noun: "horse" instead of "cowboy." If the sentence were to be rewritten, and the phrase was placed closer to "cowboy," this problem would be fixed.

hancock was president of congress when the declaration of independence was adopted and signed. he is primarily remembered by americans for his large, flamboyant signature on the declaration, so much so that "john hancock" became, in the united states, an informal synonym for signature.

explanation:

the answer is fantasy