Ineffective argument i love animals so much. i know that animals love humans, so why do people want to ban the ownership of pets? i don’t get it. the first reason i should be able to own a pet is that i love animals. my family loves having a pet. our dog is like a part of the family. my parents take care of her and take her to the doctor just like they do with me. my mom says, “i don’t know what i would do without little josie! ” i think that people should own pets because they are . my friend just told me about a neighbor whose pet parrot woke her up in the middle of the night when there was a fire. it saved her life. what a lucky person to own a parrot. honestly, what would we do without our pets? why is the argument ineffective? in a paragraph of 7–10 complete sentences, explain why the following parts of the argument are ineffective, and how they can be improved: claim support conclusion clincher point of view transitions

In his adaptation of this excerpt, laurence olivier uses high cliffs as a a background and he holds onto a knife. what's effect do these choices have?

When gatsby was in europe after world war i and circumstances forced daisy and him to face unpleasant realities about their relationship,

Read the passage from a vindication of the rights of woman. that the society is formed in the wisest manner, whose constitution is founded on the nature of man, strikes, in the abstract, every thinking being so forcibly, that it looks like presumption to endeavour to bring forward proofs; though proof must be brought, or the strong hold of prescription will never be forced by reason; yet to urge prescription as an argument to justify the depriving men (or women) of their natural rights, is one of the absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense. does wollstonecraft maintain an objective tone in the passage? yes, because she uses objective language such as “society is formed in the wisest manner.” yes, because she uses objective language such as “it looks like presumption to endeavor.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “though proof must be brought, or the strong hold.” no, because she uses subjective language such as “absurd sophisms which daily insult common sense.”