Write a naive implementation (i. e. non-vectorized) of matrix multiplication, and then write an efficient implementation that utilizes Numpy's vectorization. When writing the function ensure that the matrix dimensions are correct (print the message Wrong dimensions! otherwise).

import numpy as np  

import time  

def matrixMul(m1,m2):      

   if m1.shape[1] == m2.shape[0]:  

       t1 = time.time()

       r1 = np.zeros((m1.shape[0],m2.shape[1]))

       for i in range(m1.shape[0]):

           for j in range(m2.shape[1]):

               r1[i,j] = (m1[i]*m2.transpose()[j]).sum()

       t2 = time.time()

       print("Native implementation: ",r1)

       print("Time: ",t2-t1)

       t1 = time.time()

       r2 = m1.dot(m2)

       t2 = time.time()

       print("\nEfficient implementation: ",r2)

       print("Time: ",t2-t1)

   else:

       print("Wrong dimensions!")

Explanation:

We define a function (matrixMul) that receive two arrays representing the two matrices to be multiplied, then we verify is the dimensions are appropriated for matrix multiplication if so we proceed with the native implementation consisting of two for-loops and prints the result of the operation and the execution time, then we proceed with the efficient implementation using .dot method then we return the result with the operation time. As you can see from the image the execution time is appreciable just for large matrices, in such a case the execution time of the efficient implementation can be 1000 times faster than the native implementation.

d would be the most obvious choice to this question. leaders are supposed to herd their underlings like a shepherd to sheep. a leader should also listen to others when they are talking to one other to gain a better understanding of their mission and surroundings.

explanation:

answer: make you irritable