We saw that a copy constructor in a class X is normally declared with its parameter's type as const X&. We also saw that a compiler will not be willing to compile a copy constructor whose first parameter is instead declared with the type X. Suppose that the compiler was willing to compile it instead and that it worked according to the usual rules of C++. What would you expect to be the effect of writing a copy constructor this way and then calling it?

Given a link with a maximum transmission rate of 32.8 mbps. only two computers, x and y, wish to transmit starting at time t = 0 seconds. computer x sends filex (4 mib) and computer y sends filey (244 kib), both starting at time t = 0. statistical multiplexing is used, with details as follows packet payload size = 1000 bytes packet header size = 24 bytes (overhead) ignore processing and queueing delays assume partial packets (packets consisting of less than 1000 bytes of data) are padded so that they are the same size as full packets. assume continuous alternating-packet transmission. computer x gets the transmission medium first. at what time (t = ? ) would filey finish transmitting? give answer in milliseconds, without units, and round to one decimal places (e. g. for an answer of 0.013777 seconds you would enter "13.8" without the quotes)

The most accurate readings that you can take on an analog vom are when the meter's pointer is at the a. center scale. b. extreme right. c. near right. d. extreme left.

Kenny works with an it company. his company is about to launch new software in the market. he has to ensure that this new software is functional and meets all of the quality standards set up at the planning stage. which job profile is kenny likely to have? kenny is likely to have the job profile of a blank .