How is an interpreter different from a compiler? An interpreter translates and executes code line by line, while a compiler translates all code at once so that it is ready to be executed at any time.
An interpreter translates all code at once so that it is ready to be executed at any time, while a compiler translates and executes code line by line.
An interpreter translates programming code into binary language, while a compiler does not.
An interpreter translates binary language into programming language, while a compiler translates programming language into binary language.

Consider the following statements, then select one of the answers below: the signal() function shown below registers "sig_handler()" as the signal handler function for the sigkill signal, without the complexity of using when the sigkill signal is sent to a process running this code, by a user typing "kill -kill ", where the correct process id is used for to target the process, sig_handler() will be executed.

Write a new lc-3 trap subroutine (i. e. a subroutine that will be invoked via the trap instruction) that will receive a numeric digit entered at the keyboard (i. e. an ascii character), echo it to the screen, and return in r0 the corresponding numeric value: so if the user types the digit '7', the character '7' will appear on the screen, but the value returned in r0 will be b0000 0000 0000 0111 (#7) you may not use any trap calls in your code - you must implement the "polling" code that interrogates the keyboard status and data registers. ; getnum_tsr ; a subroutine for obtaining a numeric value ; given ascii numeric digit input to keyboard. ; the numeric digit is echoed to the console (e. g. '7' = b0000 0000 0011 0111), ; but the value returned in r0 is the actual numeric value ; corresponding to the digit (e. g. b0000 0000 0000 0111 =

In simple terms, how would you define a protocol?