Computers and Technology, 05.05.2020 05:33, yoongnzl
The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are either in error or have the wrong value in the acknum field of an acknowledged packet. Suppose that in such circumstances, rdt3.0 were simply to retransmit the current data packet. Would the protocol still work? (Hint: Consider what would happen if there were only bit errors; there are no packet losses but premature timeouts can occur. Consider how many times the nth packet is sent, in the limit as n approaches infinity).
Answers: 2
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 05:10, kellysimkin6196
Read the code below. what will the computer print if the input for year_variable is 1700? if year_variable == 1776: print("your answer is correct. the declaration of independence was signed in “year_variable”.") elif year_variable < 1776: compute_variable = 1776 - year_variable. print("add “compute_variable“ years to your answer for the correct answer.") elif year_variable > 1776: compute_variable = year_variable - 1776 print("subtract “compute_variable” years from your answer for the correct answer.")
Answers: 1
The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are...
Mathematics, 11.02.2020 01:38
Mathematics, 11.02.2020 01:38
Mathematics, 11.02.2020 01:38