Suppose we have a direct-mapped data cache with a 32-bit address. further suppose the block offset is 8 bits and the set index is 8 bits. consider a data address with this binary representation: 0111 0111 1001 1101 1101 1101 1101 1100. what is the binary representation of the corresponding block offset? what is the binary representation of the corresponding set index? does the answer to a) or b) change if the cache is two-way set associative? why or why not? (note that you can assume that the cache does increase in size to make it two-way set associative. this question is to get you to think about the nature of the relationship between the block offset, set index, and associativity.)