What is the oxidation number of cs in cs2o

Oxidation number of Cs in is +1

Explanation:

Oxidation number is defined as a number assigned to a element which represents the number of electron lost or gained by the element.

There are some general rules for assigning oxidation number:

Elements in their elemental state assigned oxidation 0.

Sum of oxidation number of all the atoms in a neutral compound is zero.

Oxidation number of oxygen in a compound is usually -2.

In peroxides, oxidation number of oxygen is -1.

If oxygen is bonded to fluorine, then its oxidation number is +1

Calculation of oxidation no. of Cs in

The given compound is neutral and not peroxides.

Therefore oxidation no. of oxygen in is -2.

Let the oxidation no. of Cs be x

2 (x) -2 = 0

x = 2/2

   = +1

Oxidation number of Cs in is +1

answer: mercury

explanation:

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.