(a) Give systematic names or the chemical formulas for the following. Remember, names must be spelled correctly!
1.) [Ni(CO)2C2O4]
2.) K3[Fe(NCO)3(OCN)3]
3.) (II) ion
4.) Al[Co(CO3)2(CN)2]
5.) (II)

[Ni(CO)2C2O4]- Dicarbonyloxalatonickel(0)

K3[Fe(NCO)3(OCN)3- II

(II) ion- [Pt(NH3)2(H2O)(OH)]^+

Al[Co(CO3)2(CN)2- III

(II)- Zn(en)(NO2)2

Explanation:

The international Union of Pure and applied chemistry published a set rules for the nomenclature of inorganic compounds in 1985. This set of rules have been consistently revised ever since.

The rules stipulate the order for naming positive ions, negative ions and neutral ligands and the allowed order of preference for naming. It also stipulates the proper endings for ligands which are positive ions, negative ions or neutral ligands as the case may be.

The compounds named above were named in accordance with the revised IUPAC nomenclature for inorganic compounds.

vanderwaal's forces of attraction are the electrostatic intermolecular forces that exist in a molecule due to the temporary or permanent dipoles that are developed in a molecule. in , the major intermolecular forces are dipole-dipole interactions as the molecule is polar (bent structure). so the vanderwaal's forces of interaction in between molecules are the permanent dipole-dipole interactions that develop due to the dipole that exists in between the polar h - s bond. the positively charged hydrogen atom is attracted towards the negative end of the dipole that is sulfur of the adjacent molecule. therefore, these forces of attraction are relatively stronger than that of london dispersion forces that exist in non polar molecules.

lol idk man i guess u gotta ask bill nye the science guy