CuSO4.5H2O(k) ısı CuSO4(k) + 5 H2O(g) eşitliğine göre bakır sülfatın kristal suyu miktarı ve kaba formülü hesaplanacaktır.

Kristal suyu içeren bakır sülfatın ağırlığı= m1=249.62…gr

Kristal suyu içermeyen bakır sülfatın ağırlığı =m2=159.62 gr olarak tartılmıştır

Buna göre bakır sülfatın (xCuSO4.yH2O) molekül formülündeki x ve y değerlerini hesaplayınız.

159.609 g/mol

Explanation:

According to the CuSO4.5H2O (k) heat CuSO4 (k) + 5 H2O (g) equation, the crystal water amount of copper sulfate and its rough formula will be calculated.

Weight of copper sulfate containing crystal water = m1 = 249.62… g

Weight of copper sulfate without crystal water weighed = m2 = 159.62 g

Accordingly, calculate the x and y values ​​in the molecular formula of copper sulfate (xCuSO4.yH2O).

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.

because of all the things that happen around the us, many people get into arguments which sadly could get physical, but we should actually make a change for that.