Chemistry, 03.04.2020 22:29, meadowsoares7

• Explain why the product had a higher mass than the reactant, and how this relates to the conservation of matter.
• What sources of error may have contributed to the percent yield not being 100 percent? (Think about things that may have led to inaccurate measurements or where mass of the product could have been lost if this experiment was conducted in a physical laboratory.)
• How do you think the investigation can be explored further?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Chemistry

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 02:10, apowers6361

26. of of (aq) by (aq) is . if 50.00 ml of 1.05 m is to 25.00 ml of 1.86 m ,at be? ( no is toina of aof) , h.. (p. ). . .

Answers: 3

continue

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 05:00, pandasarecute53

If the density of water is 1.0 g/cm3, which of these materials would float in water, based on their densities? check all that apply. aluminum cork iron lead wax

Answers: 1

continue

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 20:00, edamite12

Suppose that some of the compound spilled out of the crucible after it was heated. would that cause the percent by mass of water in the compound determined by the experiment to be too low, too high, or unchanged? briefly explain your answer.

Answers: 1

continue

Chemistry, 23.06.2019 02:50, agm0102

What is the typical rotational frequency frot for a molecule like n2 at room temperature (25∘c)? assume that d for this molecule is 1å=10−10m. take the total mass of an n2 molecule to be mn2=4.65×10−26kg. you will need to account for rotations around two axes (not just one) to find the correct frequency. express frot numerically in hertz, to three significant figures.

Answers: 3

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

• Explain why the product had a higher mass than the reactant, and how this relates to the conservat...