Some have accused this article of being biased, or
one-sided. What evidence
proves that?
A. It speaks the full truth about renewable energy
B. It does not provide any advantages to nonrenewable resources, even though there are some
C. It makes a balanced argument for both types of energy
D. It’s possible that it was written by someone in the oil industry.

i think its B but idrk the article was very long but it was really interesting for me to read i was looking at this question cause i thought it would help me with my school work but it didnt the article did help tho lol its funny how life works

b.

the accuracy of the data.

is there any options? maybe im just not seeing them but i need the options to

-love shrooms