CAN SOMEONE HELP WITH THIS CHEM LAB PART 3

Argumentation Session The argumentation session allows all of the groups to share their arguments. One member of each group stays at the lab station to share that group’s argument, while the other members of the group go to the other lab stations one at a time to listen to and critique the arguments developed by their classmates. The goal of the argumentation session is not to convince others that your argument is the best one; rather, the goal is to identify errors or instances of faulty reasoning in the initial arguments so these mistakes can be fixed. You will therefore need to evaluate the content of the claim, the quality of the evidence used to support the claim, and the strength of the justification of the evidence included in each argument that you see. To critique an argument, you might need more information than what is included on the whiteboard. You might therefore need to ask the presenter one or more follow-up questions, such as:•What did your group do to analyze the data, and why did you decide to do it that way?•Is that the only way to interpret the results of your group’s analysis? How do you know that your interpretation of the analysis is appropriate?•Why did your group decide to present your evidence in that manner?•What other claims did your group discuss before deciding on that one? Why did you abandon those alternative ideas?•How confident are you that your group’s claim is valid? What could you do to increase your confidence?Once the argumentation session is complete, you will have a chance to meet with your group and revise your original argument. Your group might need to gather more data or design a way to test one or more alternative claims as part of this process. Remember, your goal at this stage of the investigation is to develop the most valid or acceptable answer to the research question!Report Once you have completed your research, you will need to prepare an investigation report that consists of three sections that provide answers to the following questions: 1.What question were you trying to answer and why? 2.What did you do during your investigation and why did you conduct your investigation in this way? 3.What is your argument?Your report should answer these questions in two pages or less. The report must be typed and any diagrams, figures, or tables should be embedded into the document. Be sure to write in a persuasive style; you are trying to convince others that your claim is acceptable or valid!