Chemistry, 11.12.2019 00:31, diamondgdm

Astudent mixes in a test tube 3.00ml of 0.050m cuso4with 7.00ml of 0.20m nh3/nh41 . the solution becomes a deep blue color. assuming all the cu2 is complexed with nh3to form the [cu(nh3)4]2 ion, determine the concentration of the complex in the solution.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

answered: carolinamleal04

$\large \boxed{\text{0.0035 mol/L}}$

Explanation:

We are given the volumes and concentrations of two reactants, so this is a limiting reactant problem.

We know that we will need moles, so, lets assemble all the data in one place.

Cu²⁺ + 4NH₃ ⟶ Cu(NH₃)₄²⁺

V/mL: 3.00 7.00

c/mol·L⁻¹: 0.050 0.20

1. Identify the limiting reactant

(a) Calculate the moles of each reactant

$\text{Moles of Cu}^{2+}= \text{3.00 mL solution} \times \dfrac{\text{0.050 mmol Cu}^{2+}}{\text{1 mL solution}} = \text{0.150 mmol Cu}^{2+}\\\\\text{Moles of NH}_{3} = \text{7.00 mL solution} \times \dfrac{\text{0.20 mmol NH}_{3}}{\text{1 mL solution}} = \text{0.140 mmol NH}_{3}$

(b) Calculate the moles of Cu(NH₃)₄²⁺ that can be formed from each reactant

(i) From Cu²⁺

$\text{Moles of Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$} = \text{0.150 mmol Cu}^{2+} \times \dfrac{\text{1 mmol Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$}}{\text{1 mmol Cu}^{2+}}\\\\= \text{0.150 mmol Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$}$

(ii) From NH₃

$\text{Moles of Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$} = \text{0.140 mmol NH}_{3} \times \dfrac{\text{1 mmol Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$}}{\text{4 mmol NH}_{3}}\\\\= \text{0.0350 mmol Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$}$

NH₃ is the limiting reactant, because it forms fewer moles of the complex ion.

$\text{The reaction forms 0.0350 mmol Cu(NH$_{3}$)$_{4}$$^{2+}$ in a total volume of 10.00 mL.}\\c = \dfrac{\text{moles}}{\text{litres}} = \dfrac{\text{0.0350 mmol}}{\text{10.00 mL}} = \textbf{0.0035 mol/L}\\\\\text{The concentration of the complex ion is $\large \boxed{\textbf{0.0035 mol/L}}$}$

answered: Guest

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

answered: Guest

kdkdkrnmcnc

explanation:

wisjndnfnnjjdjdjxn