Rutherford's model and bohr's model are alike in that they both: reasoned that the nucleus was dense and positive and the electrons were negative and orbited the nucleus reasoned that the nucleus was negatively charged and the electrons were positively charged shared the idea of exact electron locations within the atom agreed that the "plum pudding" model of the atom was the only explanation that supported the available data

I think the answer is A. reasoned that the nuclesus was dense and positive and the electrons were negative and orbited the nucleus. Correct me if im wrong. Have a great day/evening :)

The answer is actually D. Your welcome! (:

Explanation:

cc jyfu65   6r 67r   r576dyfu r6tyuio fghjkl;

explanation:

two years ago, when picking flowers in the mountains back of yosemite valley, i found a book. it was blotted and storm-beaten; all of its outer pages were mealy and crumbly. the paper seemed to dissolve like the snow beneath which it had been buried, however; many of the inner pages were well preserved. and although all were more or less stained and torn, whole chapters were easily readable. this is the condition of the great open book of yosemite glaciers today; its granite pages have been torn and blurred by the same storms that wasted the castaway book.

two years ago, when picking flowers in the mountains back of yosemite valley; i found a book. it was blotted and storm-beaten, all of its outer pages were mealy and crumbly. the paper seemed to dissolve like the snow beneath which it had been buried, however, many of the inner pages were well preserved. and although all were more or less stained and torn; whole chapters were easily readable. this is the condition of the great open book of yosemite glaciers today, its granite pages have been torn and blurred by the same storms that wasted the castaway book.