Business
Business, 22.09.2019 10:30, ElizaSchuyler10

Does it make good strategic sense for lvmh to compete in all of its current segments? which of its product lines — wine and spirits, fashion and leather goods, perfumes and cosmetics, watches and jewelry, selective retailing, and other — do you think is/are most important to lvmh's future growth and profitability? should one or more of these current segments be discontinued? why?

answer
Answers: 1

Similar questions

Предмет
Business, 30.07.2019 04:10, amastar
As you learned in your reading of chapter 7, when considering expansion into international markets, two of the most important issues a company’s executives face are: (1) which of the three main competitive approaches to take, and (2) which strategic option for entering a foreign market to employ. general instructions: for the purpose of this discussion, assume that you are in charge of recommending an international strategy for your u.s.-based company. your company recently set a strategic objective to expand into each of the following three (3) markets within the next 3 years: brazil, india, and south africa. in each of the scenarios below, you have to make and justify your recommendations to the senior executive team. in each instance, the reasons that support your recommendations must be grounded in relevant concepts covered in tpgs chapter 7. and, consideration must also be given to the sociocultural, technological, political, legal, and economic circumstances in each of the targeted markets. [note: you should do adequate internet research to acquire some understanding of the macro-environment elements in each of these 3 countries.] suggestion: you may find it easier to comprehend and compare your recommendations (by country) if you organized them in a table or chart format. specific instructions for your initial post: scenario #1: your firm’s product is a new, highly innovative exercise machine. the machine is electric and weighs 30 pounds. 1. which of the three main competitive approaches would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries 2. which strategic option for entering a foreign market would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries? scenario #2: your firm’s product is a high-energy, dry breakfast cereal that tastes best when mixed with milk. 1. which of the three main competitive approaches would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries? 2. which strategic option for entering a foreign market would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries? scenario #3: your firm provides a bill collection service. 1. which of the three main competitive approaches would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries? 2. which strategic option for entering a foreign market would make better strategic sense to employ in each of these 3 countries?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
Does it make good strategic sense for lvmh to compete in all of its current segments? which of its...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 13.10.2019 09:20
Konu
Mathematics, 13.10.2019 09:20
Konu
Mathematics, 13.10.2019 09:20