Assume that the question of whether to rebuild the plant in Miami or in China came to a vote by the board of directors. The board voted to move the plant to China. Dawson thought that this was in violation of the duty of care. He was the only director to vote against the move. It turns out that he was correct and the shareholders decide to sue the directors. Which of the following is true? a. Dawson would be protected from a suit by the shareholders since he voted against the move.
b. Dawson would be protected since the rest of the shareholders voted in favor of the move.
c. The best protection Dawson would have is if he was identified as a dissenting director in the company's minutes.
d. The only protection that Dawson would have is if he had resigned from the board of directors.