Interpersonal Space The amount of interpersonal space (space between people while interacting) that is acceptable varies by culture. This activity is important because interpersonal space is one of the key cultural areas to understand in business if you want to bridge cross-cultural gaps. The goal of this activity is to test your knowledge of the cultural area of interpersonal space. Place each country in order according to the amount of social distance (interpersonal space in a professional interaction) that would likely be expected during a business transaction in that particular country. The country that would require the least amount of social distance between individuals would be listed as number 1 and the country that would require the largest amount of social distance between individuals would be listed as number 5. Rank the options below. United Kingdomopen choices for ranking No answer Saudi Arabiaopen choices for ranking No answer Chinaopen choices for ranking No answer Indiaopen choices for ranking No answer United States

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy. the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.