In the country of Zana, a unit of labor can produce 4 units of good X or 2 units of good Y; in the country of Bren, a unit of labor can produce 8 units of good X or 4 unit of good Y. Which of the following is true? a. Bren has absolute advantage in producing both goods X and Y.
b. Bren has comparative advantage in producing good Y.
c. Zana has comparative advantage in producing good Y.
d. Bren should export good X to Zana.
e. Bren and Zana cannot benefit from trading with each other.

1. the political environment in india has proven to be critical to company performance for both pepsico and coca-cola india. what specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? if not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. timing of entry into the indian market brought different results for pepsico and coca-cola india. what benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? 3. the indian market is enormous in terms of population and geography. how have the two companies responded to the sheer scale of operations in india in terms of product policies, promotional activities, pricing policies, and distribution arrangements? 4. “global localization” (glocalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. give examples for each company from the case.