The following data are given for Harry Company: Budgeted production 1,088 units Actual production 946 units Materials: Standard price per ounce $1.976 Standard ounces per completed unit 11 Actual ounces purchased and used in production 10,718 Actual price paid for materials $21,972 Labor: Standard hourly labor rate $14.96 per hour Standard hours allowed per completed unit 4.2 Actual labor hours worked 4,872 Actual total labor costs $79,170 Overhead: Actual and budgeted fixed overhead $1,091,000 Standard variable overhead rate $28.00 per standard labor hour Actual variable overhead costs $136,416 Overhead is applied on standard labor hours. (Round interim calculations to the nearest cent.) The direct labor rate variance is a.$19,730.93 favorable b.$6,284.88 favorable c.$19,730.93 unfavorable d.$6,284.88 unfavorable

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.