Sarah is not a resident of Washington although her website can be accessed by residents of that state. Barbara files a suit against Sarah in a Washington state court. The court is most likely to have jurisdiction over Sarah if Barbara's claim arises from Group of answer choices minimum contacts between Sarah and any Washington resident. substantial business between Barbara and Sarah through Sarah's website. passive advertising on Sarah's website. the Internet's capacity to bypass boundaries.

substantial business between Barbara and Sarah through Sarah's website.

Explanation:

A person cannot be brought to the court if the person belongs to some other state than the place where case has been filed against him. A court doe not have any jurisdiction over a person if the person is resident of some other state and the court is in some other state.

In the context, Barbara files a case against Sarah in Washington court. But Sarah is not a resident of Washington. Sarah has a website which can be accessed in Washington. Now the court in Washington can have jurisdiction over Sarah only if the claim of Barbara arises any substantial businesses between Barbara and Sarah through the website of Sarah's.

d) social security number

let me know if i am correct or not, so i can edit the answer.

the answer is "b.the increased supply will create a surplus. "

the essential thought behind price controls is straightforward - utilize the power of law to modify the equilibrium of a market. for instance, the legislature may choose that the steel business needs to survive, and in this way pass a law to set a value floor on steel. this implies all steel sold must offer at or over the floor value, which must be set over the equilibrium cost for it to have any impact. the switch could likewise happen - the administration can choose that steel is excessively costly and set a value roof underneath its equilibrium value, with the goal that all steel must be sold at or beneath that ceiling.