Suppose 1,000 students were split into two groups of 500. Both groups were first presented with an image of a new high-end pair of jeans produced by Tommy Hilfiger, a clothing company. The first group was given the following statement and then asked the following question: "The normal retail price of these jeans is $100. Would you be willing to pay $75 for them?" The second group was given the following statement and then asked the following question: "The normal retail price of these jeans is $250. Would you be willing to pay $75 for them?" Suppose that 24% of the students in the first group answered yes and that 73% of the students in the second group answered yes. It is likely that more students in the second group were willing to pay $75 for the pair of jeans because they were told the normal price was much higher. This is an example of a effect in decision-making.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.