![Business](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
![answer](/tpl/images/cats/otvet.png)
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: Business
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 22.06.2019 16:40, tylerwoodson
Match the situations that will develop one's personality and those that won't peter is surrounded by friends who are always encouraging him jonathan always watches television when he wants to take a break from his books libby sets small targets for herself and strives to achieve them. the smiths indulge in an animated discussion on varied topics every evening after dinner. brook loves junk food and exercises once in a while. develops your personality develops doesn't develop your personality
Answers: 2
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 23.06.2019 03:20, briyuna15
Suppose the following items were taken from the 2017 financial statements of whispering winds corp.. (all dollars are in millions.) common stock $3,230 accumulated depreciation—equipment $3,940 prepaid rent 175 accounts payable 1,560 equipment 6,940 patents 2,270 stock investments (long-term) 670 notes payable (long-term) 780 debt investments (short-term) 1,740 retained earnings 6,175 income taxes payable 150 accounts receivable 1,740 cash 1,290 inventory 1,010 prepare a classified balance sheet in good form as of december 31, 2017. (list current assets in order of liquidity.)
Answers: 3
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
![image](/tpl/images/cats/ekonomika.png)
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The direct write-off method: multiple choice follows the expense recognition (matching) principle. I...
Questions in other subjects:
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 22:29
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
English, 06.04.2020 22:29
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/biologiya.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 22:29
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/biologiya.png)
Biology, 06.04.2020 22:29
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 22:29
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/istoriya.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/en.png)
![Konu](/tpl/images/cats/mat.png)
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 22:29