Business, 03.06.2021 17:10, povijuaisaiah

Suppose the current level of output is 5000. If the elasticities of output with respect to capital and labor are 0.3 and 0.7, respectively, a 10% increase in capital combined with a 5% increase in labor and a 5% increase in productivity would increase the current level of output to :

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 21.06.2019 20:30, aidy8665

Afactory owner wants his workers to produce as many widgets as they can so he pays his workers based on how many widgets they produce. however, in order to make sure that the workers do not rush and produce a large number of poorly made widgets, he checks the widgets at random at various stages of their manufacture. if a defect is found in a widget, the pay of the entire section of the factory responsible for that defect is docked. how is this factory owner seeking to solve the agency conflict problem in this case?

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 16:30, cadenbukvich9923

Why is investing in a mutual fund less risky than investing in a particular company’s stock?

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 13:10, lalkjlkeu9709

Barry owns a 50 percent interest in b& b interests, a partnership. his brother, benny, owns a 35 percent interest in that same partnership, and the remaining 15 percent is owned by an unrelated individual. during 2016, barry sells a rental property with a basis of $60,000 to b& b interests for $100,000. the partnership intends to hold the rental as inventory for resale. what is the amount and nature of barry’s gain or loss on this transaction?

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Suppose the current level of output is 5000. If the elasticities of output with respect to capital a...