1. At the end of the case, Rita smiles. It would seem as if she has a better grasp about the issues surrounding the lack of use of SharePointProject. Identify four issues you think exist and why. Make sure to label each issue using numbers 1 - 4. 2. With regards to the four issues you identified in the first question above, how would you go about attempting to resolve them?
3. If TPA chooses NOT to keep SharePointProject, what are two other possible options? This will require some research.
4. Given your analysis of this situation, what is your final recommendation: keep SharePointProject or switch to another option (indicating which option you suggest). Why do you recommend this?

Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i. e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i. e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect