Should all companies use blind recruiting in place of traditional recruiting, or are there exceptions that must be considered? ​

There are advantages and disadvantages to both recruitment methods. Traditional recruitment is still the most common method of recruitment used in the world, due to its simplicity and greater speed in attracting candidates through advertisements, references and internal hiring, for example, which consequently speeds up the selection process, but this type of recruitment can lead to biased evaluations of candidates and not hiring employees based on some kind of prejudice.

In blind recruitment, however, it is not possible to identify details of curriculum and candidates, the selection is made through factors such as experience and skills of the candidate, which eliminates associated prejudices such as age, gender and ethnicity. But the disadvantage of blind recruitment is that it can reduce organizational diversity and miss details that align the candidate's values ​​to organizational culture.

Therefore, it is necessary for each company to analyze which recruitment methods will be more advantageous according to the position, with traditional recruitment being more relevant for hiring professionals for higher hierarchical positions, where there is a need for a more in-depth analysis.

the answer is a. $209,000

there's 11 people for the 1st position. then, no matter who gets it, there's only 10 left for the second, and then 9 left for the third. 11 x 10 x 9 = 990.   the answer is there are 990 different ways the positions can be filled by these applicants