You are an auditor who is charged with the assessment of the risks of material misstatement (RMM) for your client. Before you can assess the RMMs at a low level, you must test the operating effectiveness of controls. You must obtain this assurance regardless of whether the client's controls are manual or automated. Select from the option list provided whether the procedure is a test of controls, a substantive test, or neither for each procedure below. Each choice may be used once, more than once, or not at all. Procedure Type
1. Inspection of purchase orders for the authorization of the purchasing agent
2. Observation of an employee's preparation of a daily deposit slip
3. Confirmation of accounts receivable with debtors
4. Inspection of the personal financial statements of the CEO and CFO
5. Observation of the taking of the physical inventory
6. Inquiries of management concerning the assigned responsibilities of employees
7. Attempts to sign onto the computer system using various passwords
8. Comparisons of financial ratios with those of industry averages
9. Comparison of the accounts receivable subsidiary ledger with the general ledger
10. Recalculation of time approved on a sample of time cards
A. Test of controls
B. Substantive test
C. Neither
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: Business
Business, 21.06.2019 19:10, ebonsell4910
King fisher aviation is evaluating an investment project with the following case flows: $6,000 $5,500 $7,000 $8,000 discount rate 14 percent what is the discounted payback period for these cash flows if the initial cost is 15,000? what if the initial cost is $12,000? what if the cost is $16,000?
Answers: 1
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30, dondre54
The following balance sheet for the los gatos corporation was prepared by a recently hired accountant. in reviewing the statement you notice several errors. los gatos corporation balance sheet at december 31, 2018 assets cash $ 44,000 accounts receivable 86,000 inventories 57,000 machinery (net) 122,000 franchise (net) 32,000 total assets $ 341,000 liabilities and shareholders' equity accounts payable $ 54,000 allowance for uncollectible accounts 7,000 note payable 59,000 bonds payable 112,000 shareholders' equity 109,000 total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 341,000 additional information: cash includes a $22,000 restricted amount to be used for repayment of the bonds payable in 2022. the cost of the machinery is $194,000. accounts receivable includes a $22,000 note receivable from a customer due in 2021. the note payable includes accrued interest of $7,000. principal and interest are both due on february 1, 2019. the company began operations in 2013. income less dividends since inception of the company totals $37,000. 52,000 shares of no par common stock were issued in 2013. 200,000 shares are authorized. required: prepare a corrected, classified balance sheet. (amounts to be deducted should be indicated by a minus sign.)
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 05:10, srice6
1. the political environment in india has proven to be critical to company performance for both pepsico and coca-cola india. what specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? if not, could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? 2. timing of entry into the indian market brought different results for pepsico and coca-cola india. what benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? 3. the indian market is enormous in terms of population and geography. how have the two companies responded to the sheer scale of operations in india in terms of product policies, promotional activities, pricing policies, and distribution arrangements? 4. “global localization” (glocalization) is a policy that both companies have implemented successfully. give examples for each company from the case.
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 07:20, staxeeyy767
Richardson hired j. c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j. c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
You are an auditor who is charged with the assessment of the risks of material misstatement (RMM) fo...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 06.08.2021 19:30
