Collins Co. produces a part used in the manufacture of one of its products. The unit product cost is $30, computed as follows: Direct materials, direct labor, and variable overhead $18 Fixed overhead $12 Total $30 An outside supplier has offered to provide the parts for only $22 each. If the parts are purchased from the outside supplier, (1) the company estimates that 25% of the fixed overhead cost above could be eliminated; (2) the company can use the freed capacity to launch a new product, earning a contribution margin of $7 per unit. Based on these data, the per-unit dollar financial advantage or disadvantage of purchasing from the outside supplier would be: Multiple Choice $1 financial disadvantage $5 financial advantage $6 financial advantage $2 financial disadvantage

Which of the following statements is correct? a) due to limited liability, unlimited lives, and ease of ownership transfer, the vast majority of u. s. businesses (in terms of number of businesses) are organized as corporationsb) most businesses (by number and total dollar sales) are organized as proprietorships or corporation. however, if the business gets very large, it becomes advantageous to convert to a corporation, primarily because corporations have important tax advantages over proprietorships and partnerships. c) due to legal considerations related to ownership transfers and limited liability, which affect the ability to attract capital, most business (measured by dollar sales) is conducted by corporations in spite of large corporations' less favorable tax treatmentd) large corporations are taxed more favorably than proprietorshipse) corporate stockholders are exposed to unlimited liability

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Because gloria's immediate concern was the perceived gender discrimination, she would be more concerned about than intent, resultsresults, intentstatistics, trendsrace, gendergender, race