Man is termed an 'economic animal' because he a) has the ability to understand economic activities b) lives a life which is governed by economic forces c) studies economies in order to live a productive life d) uses his ability to satisfy his wants from the gifts of nature

The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.

Explanation:

that should help

answer; ///blank(1); rate-buster; blank(2) systematic soldiering;

answer; is the sum of all individual demands curves;