Business
Business, 23.02.2021 05:40, jfernald5658

Baraban Corporation has provided the following data for its most recent year of operation: Selling price per unit $ 47 Manufacturing costs: Variable manufacturing cost per unit produced: Direct materials $ 10 Direct labor $ 6 Variable manufacturing overhead $ 5 Fixed manufacturing overhead per year $130,000 Selling and administrative expenses: Variable selling and administrative expense per unit sold $ 5 Fixed selling and administrative expense per year $ 63,000 Units in beginning inventory 0 Units produced during the year 10,000 Units sold during the year 9,000 Units in ending inventory 1,000 The unit product cost under absorption costing is closest to:

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 00:10, wolfycatsz74
Which of the following is a problem for the production of public goods?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 23.06.2019 02:00, havenlynn27
In 1948, the president of the united states earned a salary of $75,000. in 2000, the president earned a salary of $400,000. knowing that the cpi for 1948 is 24.1 and the cpi for 2000 is 172.2, convert the 1948 salary to constant 2000 dollars. when comparing constant dollar amounts, whose salary was worth more--harry truman, president in 1948, or bill clinton, president in 2000
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 12:30, natetheman7740
According s. m.a. r.t guidline goal should be
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Baraban Corporation has provided the following data for its most recent year of operation: Selling p...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Social Studies, 07.10.2020 18:01
Konu
Mathematics, 07.10.2020 18:01
Konu
Mathematics, 07.10.2020 18:01