​Lilliput's aggregate income in 2015 was ​$48,002,000,500. Suppose the population of Lilliput was 20,100,500 in 2015​, of which 16,086,000 people were employed. ​Therefore, Lilliput's income per capita in 2015 was ​$nothing. ​(Round your answer to two decimal places.​) Suppose the aggregate income of Lilliput was ​$6.5 billion in​ Q1:2016, ​$5.2 billion in​ Q2:2016, ​$5.4 billion in​ Q3:2016, and ​$5.9 billion in​ Q4:2016. Lilliput ▼ suffered didn't suffer from a recession in 2016. ​Lilliput's yearly unemployment rate for 2016 is likely to be ▼ greater thangreater than not significantly different fromnot significantly different from lesser thanlesser than the previous​ year's value.

See explanation

Explanation:

1. Lilliput's income per capita in 2015 will be calculated as:

= Income / Population

= $48,002,000,500 / 20,100,500

= $2388

2. Suppose the aggregate income of Lilliput was ​$6.5 billion in​ Q1:2016, ​$5.2 billion in​ Q2:2016, ​$5.4 billion in​ Q3:2016, and ​$5.9 billion in​ Q4:2016. We can say that Lilliput (suffered) from a recession in 2016. This is because there was a fall in the aggregate income from the first quarter which was $6.5 billion to $5.4 billion in the second quarter

3. Lilliput's yearly unemployment rate for 2016 is likely to be (greater than) the previous​ year's value.

i'ts proportional. if the inflation rate is 12% for example, the cpi will be 12% less.

hope it ,

bioteacher101