Business
Business, 28.01.2021 02:30, vladsmolin7781

Adapted excerpt from Address to the Jury by Emma Goldman

Emma Goldman was a well-known anarchist, meaning someone who believed voluntary organizations should replace governments. In 1917, Goldman and fellow anarchist Alexander Berkman were put on trial for conspiring against the US government by publishing anarchist magazines. In the following speech, Goldman defends herself and Berkman.

The stage having been appropriately set for the three-act comedy, and the first act successfully played by carrying off the villains in a madly dashing automobile—which broke every traffic regulation and barely escaped crushing everyone in its way—the second act proved even more ludicrous. Fifty thousand dollars bail was demanded, and real estate refused when offered by a man whose property is valued at three hundred thousand dollars--and that after the District Attorney had . . . promised to accept the property for one of the defendants, Alexander Berkman, thus breaking every right guaranteed even to the most heinous criminal.

Finally, the third act, played by the Government in this court during the last week. The pity of it is that the prosecution knows so little of dramatic construction, otherwise it would have equipped itself with better dramatic material to sustain the continuity of the play. As it was, the third act fell flat, utterly, and presents the question, Why such a tempest in a teapot?

Gentlemen of the jury, my comrade and co-defendant having carefully and thoroughly gone into the evidence presented by the prosecution, and having demonstrated its entire failure to prove the charge of conspiracy or any overt acts to carry out that conspiracy1, I shall not impose upon your patience by going over the same ground, except to emphasize a few points. To charge people with having conspired to do something which they have been engaged in doing most of their lives—namely their campaign against war, militarism and conscription2 as contrary to the best interests of humanity—is an insult to human intelligence.



1 These were the formal charges against Goldman and Berkman.
2 Militarism is the glorification of the military in society; conscription is the military draft.

Select the correct answer.
What is Goldman’s overall purpose in giving this speech?

A.
to entertain the jury in order to distract them from the facts of the case
B.
to inform the jury about how the police and prosecutor pursued her and Berkman
C.
to express her belief that anarchism is the only way forward and the court is illegitimate
D.
to argue that the government’s case has been flawed from start to finish

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:50, Haddixhouse8948
Match each of the terms below with an example that fits the term. a. fungibility the production of gasoline b. inelasticity the switch from coffee to tea c. non-excludability the provision of national defense d. substitution the demand for cigarettes
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 16:20, valdezavery1373
The assumptions of the production order quantity model are met in a situation where annual demand is 3650 units, setup cost is $50, holding cost is $12 per unit per year, the daily demand rate is 10 and the daily production rate is 100. the production order quantity for this problem is approximately:
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, dominickstrickland
Kirnon clinic uses client-visits as its measure of activity. during july, the clinic budgeted for 3,250 client-visits, but its actual level of activity was 3,160 client-visits. the clinic has provided the following data concerning the formulas to be used in its budgeting: fixed element per month variable element per client-visitrevenue - $ 39.10personnel expenses $ 35,100 $ 10.30medical supplies 1,100 7.10occupancy expenses 8,100 1.10administrative expenses 5,100 0.20total expenses $ 49,400 $ 18.70the activity variance for net operating income in july would be closest to:
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 00:20, 218219
Firms like papa john’s, domino’s, and pizza hut sell pizza and other products that are differentiated in nature. while numerous pizza chains exist in most locations, the differentiated nature of these firms’ products permits them to charge prices above marginal cost. given these observations, is the pizza industry most likely a monopoly, perfectly competitive, monopolistically competitive, or an oligopoly industry?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Adapted excerpt from Address to the Jury by Emma Goldman

Emma Goldman was a well-known...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 21:00
Konu
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 21:00