What must be shown to prove negligence that is not needed to prove strict liability?
A. Injury
B. Fault
C. Stream of commerce
D. Defective product

A. Injury

Explanation:

Given that for strict liability, the defendant is only liable to accidents he or she causes, that is to prove strict liability, the plaintiff must show

cause and damages. Whereas on negligence, it is required of a plaintiff to show duty, breach, cause, and injuries.

Hence, what must be shown to prove negligence that is not needed to prove strict is "Injury" as it covers a lot of factors including both cause and damages of strict liability.

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.