In what situations is top-down planning likely to be superior to bottom-up emergent strategy development

Answer is given below :

Explanation:

Both strategies aim to convey and process knowledge between and within the organization. The top-down approach for sub-categories to gain insights at the senior management level breaks down a system. This is a great tool to help managers identify areas of improvement using quota and monthly matrix goals. There are flaws in this strategy, employees are not involved in the process and managers do not understand the full impact of the changes made. Morality can be affected because this strategy is motivated by fear and encouragement. The bottom line is that in some cases it is more complex, although employees feel motivated to provide more authority and quality work. The information is processed to a minimum and communicated to management. This may help in some areas because administrators may not fully understand the process. I should use the military as an example for a top down strategy. It works on the battlefield when there is no time to discuss or motivate employees. Top down is used when there is a slight change in environmental factors.