One of the technical evaluators on a multi-million dollar source selection just told you that her husband was just offered a job with one of the competing contractors. the job offer was unsolicited, tripled his current salary, and was contingent on the company getting the contract award. which administrative remedy should you pursue against this contractor?

The correct administrative remedy against such a contractor is to have them suspended.

Explanation:

The role of a technical evaluator is sensitive as it means that he or she would be privy to almost if not all information that has to do with the contract.

In the information provided, the technical evaluator's husband was offered a job at a company competing or bidding for a multi-million dollar contract she was also evaluating.

Their husband didn't ask for the job. They offered it so that they might gain information to their advantage.

The action of this contractor can be classified as fraudulent. One of the administrative actions that can be taken against such is to have them suspended with a threat to have their license permanently revoked if they should make a similar attempt again.

Cheers

answerpurchase-occasion segmentation;

answer blank(1).(2); sharpe;