Business
Business, 21.12.2020 17:40, xojade

Gross Company sold $100,000 of long-term bonds in the open market for $108,000. The entry to record the transaction would be:DR Cash100,000DR Premium on Bonds Payable8,000CR Bonds payable 108,000DR Bonds payable108,000CR Cash 108,000DR Accounts payable108,000CR Bonds payable 108,000DR Cash108,000CR Premium on Bonds Payable 8,000CR Bonds payable 100,000

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 21:40, brianmondesir1owahud
Rebel technology maintains its records using cash-basis accounting. during the year, the company received cash from customers, $43,000, and paid cash for salaries, $23,500. at the beginning of the year, customers owe rebel $1,000. by the end of the year, customers owe $6,600. at the beginning of the year, rebel owes salaries of $5,600. at the end of the year, rebel owes salaries of $3,300. determine cash-basis net income and accrual-basis net income for the year.
Answers: 2
image
Business, 23.06.2019 02:50, afropenguin2853
Marcus nurseries inc.'s 2005 balance sheet showed total common equity of $2,050,000, which included $1,750,000 of retained earnings. the company had 100,000 shares of stock outstanding which sold at a price of $57.25 per share. if the firm had net income of $250,000 in 2006 and paid out $100,000 as dividends, what would its book value per share be at the end of 2006, assuming that it neither issued nor retired any common stock?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 23.06.2019 10:00, dani595
Bagwell's net income for the year ended december 31, year 2 was $189,000. information from bagwell's comparative balance sheets is given below. compute the cash received from the sale of its common stock during year 2. at december 31 year 2 year 1 common stock, $5 par value $ 504,000 $ 453,600 paid-in capital in excess of par 952,000 856,600 retained earnings 692,000 585,600
Answers: 3
image
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00, Osorio5116
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
Gross Company sold $100,000 of long-term bonds in the open market for $108,000. The entry to record...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 00:38
Konu
History, 05.05.2020 00:38
Konu
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 00:38
Konu
English, 05.05.2020 00:38