Well, UNIT 11
Looking back
2
Arlen
I always enjoy my trips to Mexico.
A Use anyway three times in this conversation. Leave two of the blanks empty.
Mirka Where were you last week? Were you away?
Arlen Yes, I was in Mexico on busite
Mirka Mexico? What was that like?
Oh, great. The customers there are really nice.,
Mirka Not bad. I had a lot of meetings - you know, the
Arlen Sure. We can meet after work.
anyway, ...
The people are so friendly.
lot these days.
Yeah. About six times a year.
what about you? Did you have a good week?
do you want to go out
tonight? We can have dinner maybe.
I have to go. See you later.
Mirka That's nice.
So you're traveling a
M
Arlen
usual.
Mirka OK. Well,
into colete hacercations

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.