Consider the metaphor used in the article differentiating managerial and leadership roles (average managers play checkers, great managers play chess and great leaders rally people toward a better future). Does it adequately describe and differentiate these roles

Following are the solution to this question:

Explanation:

The metaphor of gambling, chess, and rallying related only to the degree of growing complexity and significance of different roles. In typical management needs and allocates capital, so named players. A senior executive not just uses the resource and also serves as a key motivator for both the company's so-called chess-making goals. Its successful leaders, however, not just to lead to accomplishing organizational targets, and also motivate individuals to serve a better future, and people are advised to rally to the metaphor is therefore said to have been accurate and is focused on the various positions and levels performed by the organization, thus distinguishing roles.

rational decision making is a multi-step process for making choices between alternatives. the process of rational decision making favors logic, objectivity, and analysis over subjectivity and insight. the word “rational” in this context does not mean sane or clear-headed as it does in the colloquial sense.

hope this

all of them make sense but, i would have to say ask someone who has been there/or lives there, and/or read recent newspapers from that city.

hope this !