Amika has a high-paying job that she loves. She works so much that she has little time for anything else, and she doesn’t have much family that she stays in contact with. In addition, Amika works with most of her friends, so she doesn’t really mind the long hours. She rarely takes her vacation days, though she loves to travel and works it into her lifestyle whenever she can. In what way does Amika’s job support and conflict with her lifestyle? She can work with her friends, which supports her social life, but she has long hours, which does not allow for family time. The job is high paying, which can support her love of nice things, but she has long hours, which does not allow for family time. The job is high paying, which can support her love of travel, but she has long hours, which does not allow for vacations. She can work with her friends, which supports her family life, but she has long hours, which does not allow for vacations.

c

explanation:

there was no passage listed but using the process of elimination i'd say it was d. the high economy would do the opposite. i don't see how low prices would affect it. high unemployment is possible but i feel d is the better answer.

answer: in the short-run firms will respond by raising the price of turkey.

explanation: initially the long-run equilibrium is at a price of $5 per pound of turkey and a quantity of 50 million pounds per year. now, when webmd claims that a protein found in turkey will increase your expected lifespan by 4 years. the consumers demand for turkey will increase at every price shifting the demand curve to the right from d1 to d2. while, there will be no change in the supply curve in the short-run as it is not possible for producers to adjust supply so quickly. as a result the new equilibrium will occur at a higher price and a higher quantity of turkey.

thus, in the short run firms will respond by increasing the price of turkey, selling more quantity at a higher price and earning economic profits.